| Penetrating the
Information Curtain
Editor's note: This March 2002 piece
from Mark Sommer of Mainstream Media Project, highlights the
need for us to challenge mental manipulations and consider a
global environment of ideas and discussion.
The Bush
administration has abruptly backpedaled on plans to open a
Pentagon Office of Strategic Influence. The agency’s function
was to feed an artful blend of fact and fallacy to the world's
media and thus persuade the global public to embrace U.S.
policies often inimical to their interests. Embarrassed by the
vociferous response from both allies and stateside critics,
Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld seemed genuinely
mystified by the outcry.
But the damage
has already been done. Who will now trust the word of a
government that not only routinely lies but announces the
formation of a Department of Deceit – and then announces that it
won’t lie after all? Which statement are we to believe?
Governments lie
and have always lied. Politics is largely a dance of duplicity
where only the observing publics believe the lofty rhetoric.
What we are seeing in the Bush administration, however, is a new
dedication to deceit as a primary tool of governance and weapon
of choice in a war against all perceived enemies foreign and
domestic. In “information warfare,” the perpetrators become so
entangled in their pathological lying to enemies, allies, their
own publics and one another that ultimately they deceive even
themselves about their own true purposes. Flying blind, they
speed towards self-inflicted disaster.
Bad information
produces bad decisions. Inflated poll numbers, sychophantic
media and unheeded warning signs yield near-term advantages over
the ponderous progress of a government of checks and balances.
But in the longer term, the gap between fact and fabrication
widens into an abyss and the entire enterprise implodes in a
catastrophic collapse of credibility.
The Bush
administration is rapidly moving to construct an impenetrable
Information Curtain between the American public and the rest of
the world. Removing the last regulatory limits on ownership of
media outlets, intimidating networks and journalists into
concealing unfavorable information, denying press access to the
battlefield, distracting the public with gladiatorial sports
spectacles laced with programmed patriotism, and keeping its
populace paranoid with the prospect of further attacks: through
a well-orchestrated manipulation of the mainstream media, Bush
administration operatives hope to seal off Americans from the
rising chorus of criticism emanating from outside the
Information Curtain.
In the realm of
information and awareness, the United States and the rest of the
world now occupy two parallel universes, separate and largely
non-intersecting. This is a still more effective system of
thought and speech repression than the ham-fisted state
censorship of communist apparatchiks because it is wholly
internalized -- a see-no-evil system of self-censorship where
citizens avert their eyes to avoid unpleasant truths and
journalists swallow their tongues to avoid losing their jobs; a
money-driven system where media (commercial and public)
consistently choose distraction and reaction over analysis and
reflection. It is the direct outcome of 75 years of
professional research and practice in the dark arts of
propaganda, public relations and advertising.
Despite
considerable diversity of perspective at the margins where few
are watching, listening or reading, the U.S. mainstream media
have become an airless echo chamber. Their insulation and
isolation create a growing dissonance between the way Americans
view their country’s role in the world and the way friends and
foes alike view those policies. In a recent poll of opinion
leaders in 24 countries, the International Herald Tribune
found that all but Americans believe U.S. foreign policies
post-911 are largely self-interested and often contrary to the
interests of the rest of the world.
Yet in an
Information Age, can American political and corporate elites
successfully seal off the world’s best-wired nation from the
voices and ideas of everyone else on the planet? There is good
reason to think not. Despite the conglomeration of global media
into ever larger entertainment empires, a cacophony of voices
and perspectives crowds the planet’s airwaves and newspapers.
Now that the Bush administration has signaled its intention to
pollute the global information stream with selective lying,
these “foreign sources” will be still less inclined to accept
the U.S. version of events. As the Pentagon launches six wars at
once, it will become increasingly difficult for its information
warfare specialists to control all sources of news filtering
back from the fronts.
Independent
sources abound. The Internet is becoming a rich source of
information for Americans seeking a broader global view – and
for others seeking a clearer view of America.. Flashes of
integrity still appear in the best mainstream U.S. journalism,
though few breach the narrowing parameters of acceptable
discourse.
The world beyond
the U.S. represents 94 percent of humanity. Many millions of
Americans share the convictions of this global majority that
fundamental change is imperative. One of the essential keys to
unlocking our latent strength is to devise innovative low-cost,
high-impact strategies to make contact with one another and
project our unheard voices onto the world stage. We must
reconceive media not as a one-way messaging service from the few
to the many but as a free-flowing conversation between equals,
many to many.
We need to
initiate a truly global conversation about global issues, where
Americans participate but do not dominate, drawing on the
collective wisdom of participants from many backgrounds and
perspectives, not just policy elites. Even without detailed
knowledge of issues and events, ordinary citizens are capable of
asking the right questions to break open the closed club that
now passes for democratic debate. In so doing, they may create a
conversation that better serves us all.
* * *
Mark Sommer is an author and internationally
syndicated columnist who directs the
Mainstream Media
Project, a U.S.-based effort to bring new voices and innovative
ideas to the broadcast media.
|